Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) Review| Categories | Wide angle |
| Product Code | B00A7Q9U9Y |
| Product Rating |  |
| Price | $599.00 |
| Where To Buy | See More Details |
| Customer Review | See More Reviews |
Considerable time is while most consist of to do with Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver).
- Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) is masterful or even good quality selection .
- Presuming The purchaser concerned as a way for pick up a bit of a Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) of any date discount rates , The purchaser can also sample to see over crest up to item items , spec or even description .
- Study precisely the reappraisal if grant the customer to apprize of a typical Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) cons or pros .
- You surely could seek to get alike stuff and nonsense and every now and then it helps oneself in choosing buy .
- You will certainly try out to see or see items .
- Get subject material of legal transfer item, cause any hooey is diverging term where they condition.
Product Details
- Color: silver
- Brand: Olympus
- Model: M. 17mm f1.8 Silver
- Dimensions: 3.30" h x
3.30" w x
3.30" l,
.30 pounds
Features
- Fast f1.8 max. aperture
- Snap focus ring for easy manual operation
- Excellent optical performance
- Fast f1.8 max. aperture
- Snap focus ring for easy manual operation
- Excellent optical performance
Product Description
This beautiful full-metal single-focal-length, wide-angle lens is ideal for shooting high-quality, dramatic landscapes and portraits. With a super-fast f1.8 M. this lens will capture brilliant low-light shots. The snap ring enables photographers to pan focus with a distance indicator.
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
34 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
17mm f1.8 or 20mm f1.7? A list of comparisons.
By Deuxieme
There's a lot of comparisons between this and the cheaper 20mm f1.7 Lumix, and I while I have both, I'll list a few reason you why you want this lens instead of the Lumix (especially on the OM-D, or Olympus bodies).1.) Much faster auto-focus. It's got to be more than several times faster, and rarely hunts. This makes it useable for quick, on-the-moment snapshots that you would never get with the Lumix. This is extraordinarily frustrating, as the camera gets in the way of your picture taking, instead of being a quick and easy instrument that just works. By far the primary reason for my purchase of the Olympus 17mm f1.8.2.) Greatly reduced purple fringing (on Olympus bodies). Panasonic bodies will auto-correct for this, but if you're using an OM-D like me, this is a huge difference. Even with chromatic aberration correction in Adobe Lightroom 4, there's noticeable band of grey as the software removes the purple, particularly in the corners with the Lumix, where the fringing can be severe in certain situations. The Olympus 17mm f1.8 naturally works without creating excessive fringing.3.) No more banding on the OM-D. The 20mm Lumix has a particularly nasty habit of creating horizontal or vertical bands that show up in the shadows, which becomes more and more visible the higher the ISO rises. I don't know who's fault it is that the issue exists, but changing to any other lens removes the problem. You would usually love using a large aperture lens in dim lighting, but not the Lumix/OM-D combo.Those are the top reasons, but there's some (somewhat negligible) nitpicks notes that go either way.1.) The 20mm Lumix has a cool color shift, towards a very slight blue-green tint, while the Olympus 17mm tends to be a little warmer, which I prefer.2.) Much is made about the the Lumix being a sharper lens, but the Olympus is still acceptable. Noticeably better than the usual kit lenses for any similarly priced manufacturer, much less a regular point and shoot. Honestly I haven't been able to tell much difference unless I zoom in on small text in the far corners.3.) Vignetting is noticeable on either lens, especially used wide open. The Olympus is slightly, but noticeably darker.4.) The metal housing is very nice, as is the general look to the Olympus in my opinion. The painted gunmetal colored plastic on the Lumix is a little off-putting (wish it was just black).5.) Both are pretty expensive relative to cheap things (you can buy whole cameras for the price of either lens), both are relatively cheap compared to expensive things (other lenses of similar performance from other manufacturers can cost much more). Price is a really difficult to thing to agree on.6.) Neither lens is very big or heavy, but the Lumix takes the cake for being more stow-able as the flatter dimensions are naturally even more compact, and a bit lighter.7.) The Olympus is super quiet to focus (I can't hear it), great for video recording. The Lumix has that typical grinding sound from cheaper lenses.8. Bokeh is a toss up to me. Neither one is has any terrible misgivings from what I've seen.9.) If you normally shoot 35mm equivalent, the 20mm Lumix (40mm equivalent) can feel awkward, especially in close quarters.10.) If you have a Panasonic body the choice is a lot harder. If you have an Olympus body, the Olympus lens makes more sense, assuming the price doesn't bother you.Overall, I think the Olympus 17mm f1.8 has its own spot nicely settled. Unfortunately it's not particularly outstanding in performance to it's other prime siblings at 12mm f2.0 and the 75mm f1.8. But then again, it's about 60% of the price. I feel a lot of the cost went to the metal housing, and it probably would have cut US$100-150 if they just used the plastic housing of the 45mm f1.8, which would have made it a no-brainer against the 20mm Lumix of Olympus body owners. But since that's not reality, the best I can give is 4 stars, probably 3.5 if you own a Panasonic body.Other people may feel differently, but this is my opinion.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful.
This lens conquers Olympus!
By P. Frary
I bought the 17mm F1.8 for $375 directly from Olympus (getolympus.com) during their Black Friday sale. Albeit a killer price, it took six weeks to grace my doorstep! In fairness to Olympus, it was labeled as a "presale" item to be delivered in mid December 2012. They were a month late but the wait was worth it.ConstructionBuild quality is immaculate with precision fit 'n finish and solid feel. The satin textured finish of the barrel matches the top plate finish of my Olympus E-P3 and looks like part of the camera. I was surprised the lens specs and scales were engraved and filled with enamel, adding to the vintage vibe of the optic. It makes my Panasonic 14mm 2.5 prime look like a plastic fantastic bow-wow. I own a 1960s era Olympus Pen and this lens is also nicer than the (non-removable) lens that came with that camera.The metal barrel adds a wee bit of heft to my ultra light E-P3. Unlike my plastic Panasonic lenses, this optic makes the rig feel balanced and solid in hand. The extra heft helps me hold the rig more steady when braced against my face. I have noted fewer blurred pictures from hand shake, but maybe I was just being extra careful since it is a new lens.Focus by WireManual focus is amazingly easy and fast to use: pull MF ring toward the body and turn to focus. Not as straightforward as the full-time manual focus on Canon USM lenses, but as close as it gets. The wired manual focus ring is easy to grip, silky smooth and finely geared, allowing precise adjustment. The precision of the manual focus reminds me of my old manual AIS Nikkors and is better than MF on any AF lens I have owned. Nevertheless I found MF bothersome via LCD but a snap through the VF-2 EVF. The old school distance and DOF scales are a nice graphic touch although I've not used them yet.Auto FocusThe auto focus of this lens is fast, silent and surefooted. I couldn't be much happier with its performance. As a point of comparison, AF speed whips my Olympus 17 2.8 pancake black and blue. It's also faster than my Panasonic 14 2.5, although not as pronounced as the former. Unlike some other reviewers, I found the 17 1.8 excellent in low light, at least on my E-P3, and it aptly nailed focus my other M4/3 lenses missed or were slow to lock.Image QualityStopped down I can't see much difference between this lens and my 17 2.8 pancake. That is to say, it is extremely sharp in the center and slightly soft around the edges. At F2.8 the 17 1.8 is definitely sharper than the pancake and with better bokeh to boot. Wide open it is excellent as long as you carefully lock focus where you want it to be sharp, as DOF is thin. Performance is best from normal to infinity distances. Macro is performance a little weaker but then Olympus doesn't profess this as a macro lens.Yes, wide open reveals a little light fall-off in the corners but is mainly noticeable if you shoot a plain white wall or empty blue sky. Normally I use F1.8 under dim street or interior conditions so the edges are dark anyway. All fast primes and zooms I've owned suffered light fall-off wide open, so this idiosyncrasy is par for the course and no biggie (easy to correct if you want). I almost always add a vignette as finishing touches to my prints and web galleries.I performed a "purple fringe" test with a strongly backlit tree and found the new optic to be much better corrected than the 17 2.8 pancake, with almost zero purple fringe. I have no worries about using this lens under backlit or high contrast conditions.DisappointmentsOlympus should include a hood with their premium lenses. Of course Olympus sells a metal silver hood as as a lens accessory for freakin' $70! So I bought a 46mm metal Leica style hood for $8 and it looks and works great: http://www.amazon.com/EasyFoto-Vented-Metal-Contax-Voigtlander/dp/B005GAB7J2/ref=cm_cr-mr-titleLast WordsOlympus has a winner here: pretty as pie, speedy and accurate AF, fast F1.8 aperture, silky smooth MF, pleasing bokeh and tack sharp images. And, yes, I enjoyed being able to shoot wide open at F1.8 while avoiding the gritty look of ISO 1600 on my E-P3. I probably won't remove the 17 1.8 from my camera for a long time as it's the perfect optic for casual snaps in bars, restaurants and sunday walks.
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful.Perfect candid street lens for the non pixel peeper...
By Matthias Lambert
I picked this up in lieu of the stellar but dated Pany 20mm f1.7. The stand out specs for me were the size, 1/2" larger than the 20mm pancake but also slightly more than a 1/2" smaller than the PL25 f 1.4. Fast f1.8, convenient and classic 35mm FL (35mm film conversion equivalent). The faster aperature over the Oly 17mm pancake makes a huge difference. I won't make this a technical review because I don't have the science to back it up. But my opinion after a week with it is what I'll share.Low light it tends to hunt a little more than my PL25 but less than the Oly 45 but tilt the camera 45degrees to get a little contrast and reframe the shot and you will be fine. The snap ring for manual focus is genius, is the closest to a mechanical focus I have used on any fly by wire lens system to date, if hey could have somehow incorporated the zoom view or a focus assist feature it would have been a perfect manual focus set-up. Like a focus peek feature, maybe in a later firmware update? The manual snap ring has a very accurate distance scale though not on screen on the lens barrel, and the snap ring places the entire fous range in a 1/4 turn of the ring meaning thre isn't the infinite spinning of the focus ring, and the infinity focus is accurate, I was able to capture some distant holiday lights with ease and fast capture in total darkness.The images can be soft at the edges but they have a character I like from my OM legacy glass, and the AF is on par with the newest M4/3 lens offerings and better than some of the original lens.In my opinion if it were weather sealed to match the newer GH3 and EM5 bodies it would be a 5star rating, but I cannot take stars off for features not there. 4 stars for the slight softness, lack of focus peeking with the snap ring engaged, otherwise a great addition to my EM5 and it slides perfectly into a jacket or cargo leg pocket now.
For sale now at affordable price, promo discounts and super shipping. I'm quite satisfied with the qualities and recommend it to all people wanting for a excellent product with the newest specifications at an cheap. You can read testimony from buyers to find out more through their experience. Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) has worked beneficial for me and I wish it will do wonders on you too. So why spend any more time? Enjoy yourself, you understand where you can purchase the best ones.
Most people reviews speak that the Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8 (Silver) are splendid luggage. Also, It Is a pretty well product for the price. It�s great for colony on a tight budget. We�ve found pros and cons on this type of product. But overall, It�s a supreme product and we are well recommend it! When you however want to know more details on this product, so read the reports of those who have already used it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.