Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras Review| Categories | Wide angle |
| Product Code | B005IY2OD4 |
| Product Rating |  |
| Price | $748.00 |
| Where To Buy | See More Details |
| Customer Review | See More Reviews |
Cash is while many offered about Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras.
- Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras is consummate and an outstanding products on hand .
- Presuming The buyer concerned as a way for pick up a Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras from the night out savings, The purchaser are able to trial to view well over peak around collections details , spec or verbal description.
- Take exactly the reassessment in the event allow the customer to apprize of the Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras problems or professionals.
- You surely could endeavor to get alike poppycock or every now and then it helps oneself in choosing reserve .
- You could possibly try out to view or ensure content .
- Get subject material of livery particular , grounds any stuff and nonsense is diverging term plus they condition.
Product Details
- Color: Black
- Brand: Sony
- Model: SAL1650
- Dimensions: 5.20" h x
5.39" w x
7.56" l,
Features
- DT Lens Design for optimum performance with APS-C DSLRs
- Superb wide-angle to mid-range telephoto shots
- Wide f/2.8 aperture for fast response and strong depth-of-field
- DT Lens Design for optimum performance with APS-C DSLRs
- Superb wide-angle to mid-range telephoto shots
- Wide f/2.8 aperture for fast response and strong depth-of-field
Product Description
A more compact llens designed specifically for use with APS-C size sensors.
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
67 of 68 people found the following review helpful.
The best general purpose lens for Sony Alphas (APS-C)
By D. F. Watt
This is a beautiful (albeit not light or cheap) partner for the Sony Alphas, esp. the new A77 and A65. The term 'kit lens' might be misleading, typically implying very average optics in order to get a flexible focal length. This is clearly the sharpest 16-50 2.8 on the market right now, and perhaps slightly sharper than the pricey alpha mount Carl Zeiss 16-80mm, but without the reach at the telephoto end. Balancing that, it is significantly faster than the CZ 16-80. After surfing through many dozens of lens reviews at the phenomenal ImagingResource collection of lens tests, not only is this the sharpest 3X zoom range lens for Sony alpha cameras, it right now is the sharpest 16-50 2.8 lens available on any DSLR, full frame (which would be 24-75mm equivalent) or APS-C, from any manufacturer. Only the Panasonic 12-35 2.8 (for micro 4/3 cameras) is as sharp in as wide a range of focal lengths as this lens (in terms of so-called kits lenses).It is not an overstatement to suggest that this might be one of the finest general purpose lenses for any APS-C digital camera - and one of the very best values in digital optics. If you're skeptical of this claim, take a close look at the lens tests at Imaging Resource (a great resource for photographers). Not many zoom lenses even come close, and it beats many prime lenses at 16-35mm (including some prime lenses of those highly touted competitors, Canon and Nikon). At f4, it beats several highly rated Sony prime lenses between 16-35mm, and at 5.6, comes very, very close to the 1.4 50 prime lens in sharpness. Even the highly-touted pro-grade Canon and Nikon 24-70 zooms (for full frame cameras) are not quite as sharp overall as this lens (they both fade a bit at the tele end in terms of sharpness, while this does not). If you need convincing, check out the lens reviews at Imaging Resource and compare this lens to high-end Canon and Nikon pro-grade zooms that the DP press raves about. It beats both of them in terms of sharpness. Its sharpness reaches 1/2 blur unit (the sharpest one can achieve in the Imaging Resource tests) over much of the frame at f4, with just a trace of increased softness in the corners (just over one blur unit). Although in the past Sigma and other 3rd parties offered 17-50 or 18-50 2.8 lenses that might compete with Sony's own, when you consider the issue of firmware corrections (not available now for any 3rd party glass and probably never will be), this lens becomes not just the better lens objectively, but the better value relative to the Sigma 17-50 2.8 alternative - it is sharper too by a significant margin.Given that Sony Alpha 65/77 firmware now corrects all the classic optical distortions (chromatic aberration, vignetting and barrel/pincushion) for many Sony lenses (and this includes many of the more popular Sony lenses including this one), this lens becomes one of the very best optical values in digital photography, particularly when paired with any A77 or A65. Again, that sounds like a grandiose claim, but please, if you're skeptical, just look at the testing. For $699, it's simply a steal, and becomes one of the reasons to think about buying an APS-C Alpha camera (the new A65/77). This lens is nothing less than a technical tour de force in photographic optics for APS-C sensors . . . . and a best value to boot.Pros:1) Sharpest lens of its kind right now for any APS-C digital camera.2) Not bad CA, distortion and vignetting, and close to zero in those problem areas with the A65/A77 firmware corrections.3) Fast and silent focusing with SSM (the latter a big plus with HD movies on Sony A33/35/55/65/77).4) Decent range (3.2X) that covers realistically about 85% of what most people typically shoot. Perfect for portraits and good wide angle for landscapes.5) Fast - even minimally stopped down to f4 (where it is sharpest), it is faster than many other standard zooms are wide open (and WAY sharper).6) Great value when priced against the Nikon/Canon competition (cheaper than any of their glass of even close to this quality).7) Best possible everyday lens for the A65/77.Cons:1) Big and heavy (have to concede weight to get a constant aperture 2.8 zoom lens).2) Not cheap compared to the standard 'kit' lens (a decent 15-55mm option but not nearly as fast or as sharp).3) Can't be bought with the Alpha 65 as its kit lens (why does Sony do that?)4) Wish it just went to 65mm or so (suspect they simply had to trade some reach for its great sharpness).5) Might be a bit heavy for the compact Sony A33/35/55 series cameras.Overall, this is a killer deal and offers a no-compromise option for the highest quality images your Sony SLT/DSLR can generate, without having to carry more than two lens - this and a telephoto. If you have a Sony APS-C camera, you should have this lens, no questions asked. Highly, highly recommended.
28 of 28 people found the following review helpful.Good Walkaround Lens
By robertsmx
Sony DT 16-50mm/2.8 SSM replaces Sony DT 18-55mm/3.5-5.6 (SAL1855 DT SAM) in my inventory of lenses. The 18-55 was the kit lens for my Sony A55. I had two main and one "nice to have" reasons to go for it:1- Larger (and constant) aperture, f/2.8, throughout the zoom range.2- SSM over SAM for those moments especially when the choice is video recording.3- This is a parfocal lens. In other words, it will maintain focus across focal lengths when zooming in/out.The negatives, especially compared to the 18-55, are that it is substantially chunkier and heavier. In fact, it is nearly identical in both regards to my travel zoom lens (Sigma 18-250mm/3.5-6.3 HSM). But it is the kind of tradeoff we can look for, with a constant large aperture, SSM and all those elements with 72mm threads. The additional benefit of the large glass to me was that I could now share 72mm filters between three of my primary lenses (Sony 16-50/2.8 SSM, Sigma 18-250/3.5-6.3 HSM and Minolta 200/2.8 APO G HS).The build quality and feel is exceptional. IMO, this lens would easily qualify for a "G" lens. Probably the only thing that gets in the way of that recognition is that it was designed for APS-C cameras. My limited experience so far points at great image quality, sharpness, colors and a good bokeh. I have added a few sample photographs (significantly downsized). None of them are processed in any way (other than a significant downsizing in size). I also tried to see any signs of chromatic aberration, inside and out, against bright lights, wide open at extreme ends of the zoom, but did not see any. Flare issue, however, can be regarded as moderate if the sun is slightly to the side. So the included hood will find use. Flare is appears to be well controlled when looking straight into the sun. It also has an excellent MFD (less than a foot), with a magnification ratio of 1:5.Some will find maximum zoom at 50mm to be limiting. My personal take on the subject is that greater zoom will require greater compromise. I see this as a "flexible prime" with design focus being on good performance over 16-35mm. That beats carrying a 24mm prime or 35mm prime or both, or a 50mm prime as well. Sure, it would be great to have the zoom reach out to 70mm, but surely not at the expense of compromise to the more useful 16-35mm range. For longer zooms, I could go with the 18-250 anyway.So, why bother with 16-50, if one has 18-250 or a lens like that? The Sigma zoom has the reach for sure, and good picture quality between 24-50mm. But it is slow. The largest aperture at 18mm is f/3.5 which jumps to f/5.0 at 50mm. So, the 16-50 wins by a significant margin in low light performance. It also goes wider (16mm versus 18mm) which can be important in landscape and especially indoor photography as sometimes taking two steps back is not an option. Something more important is that at their widest focal lengths, the Sony seems better at distortion.Outside of budget constraints, IMO, it makes for a good walk around lens. Not great? Well, it would be, if we can get past the weight and size! But certainly beats carrying multiple primes, much less changing lenses.
27 of 28 people found the following review helpful.Best kit upgrade lens for the A65 - Awesome for indoor kid photos
By Adam
This lens is a substantial upgrade to the kit 18-55mm kit lens that comes with the A65 and it is worth the money as it practically gives you an entirely new camera to work with. This review will focus on the key differences between this lens and the kit lens, and is really aimed at the non-expert.Pros vs Kit lens:1) The image quality is flat out better than the kit lens. Colors are a bit brighter, contrast and sharpness are improved. Not dramatic but definitely noticeable.2) Max Aperture of F2.8 vs the kit lens F3.5-5.6. allowing a faster shutter speed or a lower ISO with the same lighting conditions. At the wide angel, this lens will be twice as fast. At telephoto, it will be 4 times faster. This makes a huge difference in indoor photography especially if you have a fast moving subject like a child.3) The F2.8 aperture gives better background blur (called bokeh) and this lens's bokeh is quite pleasing. This makes photos look much, much more professional and allows you to really focus in on your subject.4) Focusing is incredibly fast and silent. After shooting 2000 or so pictures with this lens, I am yet to have the camera hunt for the focus.5) The focus ring has zero play and turns with just the right amount of force to allow accurate focusing.6) Full time manual focusing lets you quickly adjust the focus in the rare case when the camera focuses on the wrong thing.7) Exceptional zoom smoothness and feel which allows smooth, steady zooming during video while the kit lens is much harder to do this with.8) The A65 and A77 are designed to work with this lens and will correct most of it's flaws even in RAW shooting. This removes almost all distortion (weird head shapes on the edge of the frame)Cons:1) This lens is pretty heavy, it weighs in right around a pound. I recommend grabbing a hand strap and ditching the neck strap if you are going to be using this mostly inside. Here is the one I have and I have loved it. Opteka Professional Wrist Grip Strap for Digital & Film SLR Cameras2) It's bulkier so you might have to get a different camera bag.Again, this lens is a HUGE upgrade over the kit lens. You will get much more professional quality of results and be able to take pictures in much more challenging lighting compared to the A65 kit lens.Oh and if you are thinking about getting the Tamron or Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 lenses. Don't bother. They don't have the in camera correction and the focusing is not nearly as accurate. The result is that you can't use it for taking pictures at the wide end in anything which has a straight line or definite geometry.
Available now at affordable price, promo discounts and fast shipping. I am really satisfied with their features and highly recommend it to anyone wanting for a high quality product with the newest specifications at an cheap. You can read review from buyers to find out more from their experience. Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras has worked wonders for me and I hope it will do wonders on you too. So why spend much more time? Enjoy yourself, you understand where to buy the best ones.
Most people reviews speak that the Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 Standard Zoom Lens for Sony A-Mount Cameras are splendid luggage. Also, It Is a pretty well product for the price. It�s great for colony on a tight budget. We�ve found pros and cons on this type of product. But overall, It�s a supreme product and we are well recommend it! When you however want to know more details on this product, so read the reports of those who have already used it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment